![]() (My Opinion) I find it no more or less convenient than OS when tuning and flashing It is expensive especially when you consider both the cost of the AccessPort itself and a pro-tune. I believe the AP V3 promises full FlexFuel capability (Not sure about this) Cobb's approach to Speed Density is more logical and better implemented. AccessTuner Race is a great tuning solution. Has a wide selection of professionally created maps It allows you to temporarily adjust timing globally to diagnose or compensate for bad gas without having to create a tune for bad gas. It is convenient when monitoring live data and resetting the ECU. It is convenient when wanting to switch maps like switching between E85 and 93. I'm moving on to Open Source and leaving the Cobb Accessport behind me. These should be fundamentally good enough to begin with. So let's start with those and as we go on, I will be asking more questions. Correct me if that is wrong!Ĭobb Accessport has the simplicity of carrying it around and using it whenever as opposed to a Tactrix and a laptop. I know that Open Source is a cheaper alternative and that it offers more than something like the Cobb Accessport. :tup:Ģ) What is the difference between Open Source tuning and Cobb Accessport (What type of tuning is this called? Off the shelf? Closed source? :tard: ) tuning?ģ) What're the benefits and downsides of being Open Source?Ĥ) What're the benefits and downsides of being Cobb Accessport tuned? It will have newbie questions and whatnot. This first post will be edited over time. ![]() If there is a better location for it, feel free to move it. Not sure if this is the correct place to post this. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |